Magpie Monday

Here are some shiny things that caught my eye recently:

♦ Attention, Hellboy fans: over at io9, Mike Mignola talks about his 2012 plans for the big red guy. I’m really looking forward to Hellboy in Hell, but, I’m sad to report, that series doesn’t start until August.

♦ Yes, I know Christmas cartoons are, like, so last year already, but I was rather taken with Dave Roman’s timeline of the Rankin/Bass Christmas specials. He says, by way of introduction to his well-thought-out chronology:

Growing up, I always tried to work ongoing entertainment franchises into a cohesive continuity…even if that was never the producers’ intention. Did the Ewok TV movies take place before or after “Return of the Jedi”? How could The Muppets share a nursery as babies but not know each other when they reunite in “The Muppet Movie”? This stuff kept me awake at night! So even though I know better now, I always wanted to make a timeline for the original Rankin/Bass holiday specials.

Roman and I should totally be friends because I too am obsessed with continuity no one else cares about! Really, it’s a curse…. Via.

♦ As a writer who continues to be repeatedly rejected, I take comfort in hearing stories about famous, well-respected writers who also suffered from repeated rejections. Gives one hope, or misery loves company, or something like that. Anyway, last week I came across a link to 50 Iconic Writers Who Were Repeatedly Rejected (unfortunately, I can’t remember where I came across the link), and it’s worth a look. However, as Cameron noted, the blurb about Anne Frank is pretty insensitive.

♦ 1979 Semi-Finalist had a nice list of 13 Fantastic Female Comics Creators of 2011. I’m only familiar with about seven of the creators listed, and I can definitely confirm that they are fantastic.

♦ Maybe it’s because I’m probably going to end up on Hoarders: Buried Alive some day myself (plus, I love miniatures), but I’m digging Carrie M. Becker‘s photo series, Barbie Trashes Her Dreamhouse. Babs, I feel you.

The Living Room, 2011 by Carrie M. Becker

Click to see a larger image. Via.

♦ Thank goodness io9’s interests are wide ranging, else I would never have heard about the Hanke-Henry Permanent Calendar, which would finally put everything in a very ordered, logical system. I needed to know such a proposal was afoot. Maybe you did, too?

♦ Last spring, I remember hearing about Ron Moore’s new show, 17th Precinct, a police procedural that uses magic instead of science. Unfortunately, the show never made it past the pilot episode and so fell off my radar—until io9 (bless them!) posted this article about the pilot accompanied by a not-long-for-this-world video of the episode. So, fearing the video would soon disappear, I watched it on Friday, when I really should have been working on my syllabi for the spring semester (good thing, too—on Saturday, the video actually was gone from this world, or the internet, at least). Let me just say that, based on the pilot, if 17th Precinct had made it to the screen, I would have been watching the hell out of that show, which is saying something for me, since I’ve been trying to avoid getting sucked into real-time serial watching. For those of you who didn’t get to see the video, io9 does a great job of breaking down the pilot (I’ll admit to being a little disappointed with the big reveal at the end of the pilot episode), but it was a fine, fine thing to watch. Ah, what might have been!

♦ If you ever wanted to remix James Joyce, your time is now—The Irish Times reported that the EU copyright on Joyce’s work expired at midnight on New Year’s Eve, so now everything (or, at least, the work published while he was alive) is in public domain, including Dubliners, A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man, Ulysses, and Finnegans Wake. I expect crazy mash-ups will follow soon enough, but I’m looking forward to seeing what people with a genuine respect for the material do with it. Via.

♦ A new year is upon us, and no one offers better new year’s wishes than Neil Gaiman. Here’s his wish for 2012:

And for this year, my wish for each of us is small and very simple.

And it’s this.

I hope that in this year to come, you make mistakes.

Because if you are making mistakes, then you are making new things, trying new things, learning, living, pushing yourself, changing yourself, changing your world. You’re doing things you’ve never done before, and more importantly, you’re Doing Something.

So that’s my wish for you, and all of us, and my wish for myself. Make New Mistakes. Make glorious, amazing mistakes. Make mistakes nobody’s ever made before. Don’t freeze, don’t stop, don’t worry that it isn’t good enough, or it isn’t perfect, whatever it is: art, or love, or work or family or life.

Whatever it is you’re scared of doing, Do it.

Make your mistakes, next year and forever.

And here’s a poster someone made of Gaiman’s perhaps most well known new year’s wish, which I think is quite grand (both the wish and the poster):

And so I wish all of that for you, Dear Readers. Happy New Year!

Posted in Magpie Monday | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

Magpie Monday

Here are some shiny things that caught my eye recently:

♦ Just before the holiday break, I took the official Myers-Briggs Type Indicator through our Career Services office. Many years ago, I’d taken an online version and scored as an INFJ (Introversion, Intuition, Feeling, Judging), and the characteristics seemed like a pretty accurate description (I’m pretty sure I read this page, and on another page the INFJ was described as “The Counselor,” which also seemed fairly accurate). So I was surprised when the results came back and I tested as an INTJ (Introversion, Intuition, Thinking, Judging), but the description was too spot-on to deny:

Have original minds and great drive for implementing their ideas and achieving their goals. Quickly see patterns in external events and develop long-range explanatory perspectives. When committed, organize a job and carry it through. Skeptical and independent, have high standards of competence and performance—for themselves and others.

You can find that description and the other fifteen personality types here. What I thought was most interesting was how my colleague Linda, who went over the results with me, talked about how understanding personality types really helps with communication—how do I receive information as an INTJ and how do I convey information effectively to other personality types. Interesting stuff!

♦ A few posts reflecting about fantasy have popped up lately that I found interesting food for thought about the genre (nothing spellbindingly new, but I always like reading about the genre):

John H. Stevens, “My Year of Bellowing about Fantastika,” at SF Signal

Richard Thomas, “Fantasy in 2012,” at Fantasy Matters. Via.

Theodora Goss, “Why Fantasy?” and “Why Fantasy? Part 2.” Here’s the part of Goss’s first post I connected with the most:

I do write fantasy in part because it allows me to speak about longing and connection. But I also write fantasy because it allows me to describe the world we actually live in—a world which can be profoundly alienating, which is at its core fantastical. And it allows me to imagine a world that is different from the one we live in—because imagining different worlds may be the only way we can actually understand and change our own.

And here’s the part from Goss’s second post that I particularly liked:

Fantasy is dangerous because it is inherently subversive. To depart from reality is to question it as reality – to imagine alternatives. And that’s why I write it. Because it seems to me that much of what passes for reality is in fact an illusion, which often functions to maintain certain hierarchies and structures of power. I don’t think of these things when I write a story. Then, all I think about is story. But the underlying ideas and motives are there.

♦ If you’re looking for some fine post-holiday reading, why not check out issue 14 of Scheherezade’s Bequest over at Cabinet des Fees?

Some posts about writing you might enjoy:

I enjoyed C.A. Belmond’s article, “Writer’s Wednesday: 5 Lies They Tell You about Writing,” which I found via Elizabeth Hand on Facebook. She debunks each of the following misleading ideas young writers are often fed: 1. Write what you know; 2. Descriptions are passé. Brand names are cool; 3. Fiction is a lie; 4. Literary fiction equals literature (and is therefore superior to genre fiction); 5. “Hey, writers are entertainers. I’m not trying to be Tolstoy.”

Chuck Wendig may describe his writing posts as “booze-soaked, profanity-laden shotgun blast[s] of dubious writing advice,” but his 25 Things Writers Should Know about Rejection is anything but dubious.

Sean Ferrell wrote an encouraging piece for writers, if you happen to be feeling small. Via.

This Wondermark cartoon by David Malki!, “The Tyranny of Quality,” cracked me up (click the link to see the “punchline” when you hover the cursor over the cartoon):

♦ The blog Hey Oscar Wilde! It’s Clobberin’ Time “is an extension of a personal art collection of various artists interpreting their favourite literary figure/author/character.” I’m not sure how I missed this blog before, but it’s pretty fun. You’ll find lots of different kinds of art and subjects on Hey Oscar Wilde!—go check it out after looking at the samples below!

Via.

Over at her blog The Kissed Mouth, Kirsty Stonell Walker has a great discussion on the painting below, At the First Touch of Winter, Summer Fades Away (1897) by Valentine Cameron Prinsep (click below image to make bigger). I’m pretty familiar with Victorian painting, but I’d never seen At the First Touch of Winter before. Great, great stuff.

♦ The tumblr Awesome People Hanging Out Together is exactly as described: photographs of awesome people just hanging out together.

Via.

♦ The very talented paper artist Su Blackwell did the set design work for a production of The Snow Queen, based on Hans Christian Andersen’s fairy tale, at the Rose Theatre, Kingston upon Thames. Enchanting, as ever. Check the link for more pictures.

♦ io9 did a feature on Daniel James Cox, who’s painted several superhero portraits. My favorite is the painting of Galactus, Devourer of Worlds, titled Galactus and the Surfer (click to embiggen),

though I also really like Wonder Woman Flies over Themiscyra

♦ Fun for the whole family: Jeff Gurwood‘s made Indyanimation, “a stop motion animated, shot for shot remake of the most exciting six minutes in film history—the opening scene of Raiders of the Lost Ark!” Via.

Posted in About Writing, Magpie Monday | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Magpie Monday

Here are some shiny things that caught my eye recently:

Kyle Bean made the London Underground map out of drinking straws (click to see larger).

Via.

♦ This post has been making the rounds, but I first found it via my friend Molly on Facebook: A Girl You Should Date by Rosemarie Urquico. My favorite line comes at the end: “If you want the world and the worlds beyond it, date a girl who reads. Or better yet, date a girl who writes.”

♦ In New York Magazine, Rachel Friedman, in “Livelihood of the Poets,” offers some numbers about the microeconomics of poets, which is both interesting and sobering for most poets. I found the article via Kristy Bowen’s blog, who has a good response to the economics of poetry by way of her own experience. The Ivory Tower isn’t always the answer, folks.

♦ Kate Beaton posted some of her work about Wuthering Heights this week; below is my favorite, but be sure to check out the entire piece—or, better yet, buy Hark! A Vagrant.

♦ On her blog last week, Nnedi Okorafor wrote an interesting post about the statuette given out for the World Fantasy Award, which is a bust of H.P. Lovecraft (designed by Gahan Wilson), titled “Lovecraft’s Racism and the World Fantasy Award Statuette, with Comments by China Mieville.Okorafor says, “If Lovecraft’s likeness and name are to be used in connection to the World Fantasy Award, I think there should be some discourse about what it means to honor a talented racist.” Embedded in that post is the question of whether or not the WFA award statuette should be changed, and the interwebs have been buzzing about the possibilities. Nick Mamatas suggests a statue of a chimera because “fantasy is a lot of things” (too true!), and Theodora Goss recommends “the award should be different each year, and it should be designed by a contemporary fantasy artist. Imagine winning an award designed by Shaun Tan or Charles Vess or Omar Rayyan! That would also recognize the wonderful work being done in fantasy art, which is such an important part of book publication in this ‘genre’ (a word I use for convenience, since I don’t think fantasy is a genre).” I hope this discussion moves from the realm of the theoretical and into the practical because it’s an important topic for us to consider.

♦ Jeff VanderMeer interviews Haruki Murakami over at Omnivoracious.

♦ Paul Graham has a great post about Stuff on his website (yes, he posted it in 2007, but I only just discovered it). I have a weird relationship with my stuff. On the one hand, I love stuff, love having weird stuff (I want my house to be a Wunderkammer, yo). On the other, my stuff weighs on me sometimes. I think I’m holding on to too much of the wrong stuff. However, Graham and I agree that books aren’t stuff; I love his description of books as fluid:

I’ve now stopped accumulating stuff. Except books—but books are different. Books are more like a fluid than individual objects. It’s not especially inconvenient to own several thousand books, whereas if you owned several thousand random possessions you’d be a local celebrity. But except for books, I now actively avoid stuff. If I want to spend money on some kind of treat, I’ll take services over goods any day.

Via.

♦ I’m a sucker for annotated editions, so I’m really looking forward to The Annotated Sandman, Vol. 1, edited by Leslie Klinger, which comes out in January from Vertigo and covers the first twenty issues of the series. Every good Sandman fan knows of Ralf Hildebrandt’s impressive and helpful online annotations of The Sandman; I loved reading Hildebrandt’s work, but in the end I’m a paper kind of guy. Comparing Hildebrandt’s and Klinger’s annotations will be fun. You can see some preview pages here.

♦ For Cameron, I offer “The Legend of Zelda Medley” by Lindsey Stirling. You’re welcome!

Via.

Laika’s 2011 holiday card!

A Very Calvin & Hobbes Christmas has been making the rounds. If you enjoyed Bill Watterson’s Calvin & Hobbes and/or Calvin’s snowmen creations as much as I did, you’ll enjoy this animation from Jim Frommeyer and Teague Chrystie quite a bit:

Below is my all-time favorite Christmas carol, though it’s neither Christmas-y nor a carol, but there you go. “Snow,” arranged and sung by Loreena McKennitt, began as a poem by Canadian poet Archibald Lampman (the original poem can be read here). I first discovered the song on McKennitt’s album A Winter Garden: Five Songs of the Season (which is now out of print; McKennitt has since re-released the song on To Drive the Cold Winter Away, though I don’t like the arrangment on that version as much as the original). To me, this song perfectly encapsulates the season, and I can listen to it over and over again.


Posted in Magpie Monday | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Magpie Monday

Magpie Monday

Here are some shiny things that caught my eye recently:

♦ One of my favorite Christmas specials is the Rankin/Bass delight ‘Twas the Night Before Christmas, which I don’t think has ever been as popular as I think it should be. Anyway. The plot is a variation of the “Non-believer learns to believe in Santa” trope, wherein a smartypants dooms his town to not receiving a visit from Santa because he doesn’t believe and writes a letter to that effect. Did I mention this smartypants is a mouse? That’s the weird thing about this town–people and talking mice, who dress like people, too. Anyway. A second complication ensues, but in the end Joel Grey (didn’t I mention that he’s the star?) gets to recite Clement Moore’s titular poem, and everyone’s happy. A huge singing clock is involved, too, and every time I hear these lyrics

Christmas chimes are calling, Santa! Santa!
Every heart beat calling, Santa! Santa!
C’mon, ol’ Kris Kringle, down the Milky Way
Christmas chimes are calling, Santa, we need you today!

I just get happy and sad at the same time. You have to hear it to get why. Anyway, I watched ‘Twas the Night Before Christmas on ABC Family the other night and cried into my eggnog, so happy was I.

♦ In the category of geeked-out cool, io9 compiled a chart of “The Rules of Magic, According to the Greatest Fantasy Sagas of All Time.” Really impressive research—and neat to read, too.

♦ Over on SF Signal, Daniel Abraham offers A Private Letter from Genre to Literature, which I thought was nifty, straddling the two as I do in both my day job and my own writing. Nick Mamatas offers a more pragmatic response to the letter, and I don’t disagree with him, but I still think Abraham’s letter is fun (am I an epistolary nerd?). Here’s a good piece of advice from Mamatas’s post:

Anyway—here’s a secret. This is what creative writers should be interested in doing. Writing their own best material. Not the most popular thing, or the most acclaimed, or that which will be part of some conversation or leave a mark on this or that genre (including bourgeois realism), but that stuff that is unique to yourself and the complex of life experiences and interests and prior readings and environmental factors of which your writing is an emergent property.

♦ Stevan Živadinović only has three parts available of Hobo Lobo of Hamelin, a retelling of “The Pied Piper of Hamelin,” but it’s definitely worth checking out. io9 describes the cool visuals thus:

But the visuals here really are a treat. This isn’t a 3D comic as in “put on your 3D glasses and watch uncanny rats jump out at you.” It’s a digital experience that gives the illusion that you’re looking inside a story box. As you scroll through the comic, scenes and characters move around in a way that looks far more mechanical than digital, and although Živadinović occasionally uses animation in his storytelling, it complements rather than overwhelms the rest of the art.

Via.

♦ I’m pretty interested in the first issue of Unstuck, a new literary annual based in Austin, TX, which comes out today. The website describes the annual as emphasizing “literary fiction with elements of the fantastic, the futuristic, the surreal, or the strange.Stefan Raets reviews Unstuck #1 at Tor.com, too.

♦ Once Upon A Blog…. talks about the 2011 Pageant of the Masters, an annual event of the Festival of the Arts in Laguna Beach, CA, wherein famous works of art are presented with live people (as opposed to dead ones, naturally). This year’s theme is “Only Make Believe,” which produced some great pieces—images and video at the link above.

I wish I’d been able to buy this ornament—creepy cool. I’ll just keep an eye out at Madame Macabre Shop on Etsy and hope she makes another.

Via.

♦ On Facebook, Theodora Goss linked to this post at Carl King’s blog about 10 Myths About Introverts, which I found fascinating, probably because they describe me to a tee. King’s post was inspired by the book The Introvert Advantage: How to Thrive in an Extrovert World, by Marti Olsen Laney, which I’m going to put on my wish list. Or just buy it myself.

♦ I love Kate Beaton’s work, and this week she posted some great cartoons about Wonder Woman. Below is my favorite, but do click through and check out the rest.

Me, too!

Posted in Magpie Monday | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

Christopher Barzak’s The Love We Share Without Knowing

I’d selected The Love We Share Without Knowing by Christopher Barzak (Bantam, 2008; all quotations are taken from this edition) to examine because I wanted to see how he handled the structural concept of interrelated short stories (or a novel-in-stories), and I certainly learned a lot. I have a set of stories that are interrelated by virtue of an over-arching plot as well as by featuring subsequent-generation protagonists (the second story’s protagonist is the granddaughter of the first story’s protagonist, the third story’s protagonist is the granddaughter of the second story’s protagonist, etc.). I have ideas for additional stories to fill out that set, but I think the problem is that those stories work more as chapters than standalone stories, and I’m always curious to see how other writers handle such a concept. To that end, Barzak’s novel-in-stories gives me a lot of food for thought. Warning: Spoilers to follow.

Continue reading

Posted in About Writing, Criticism & Reviews | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Christopher Barzak’s The Love We Share Without Knowing